Bad drivers: this is why we can’t have nice things

Van insurance news roundup: 7 days ending 4 April 2014:

While it sounds like something Captain Obvious would say, it’s true: bad drivers ruin things for the rest of us, especially when it comes to our car insurance.

It doesn’t matter if you’ve got a fleet of vehicles you’d like to insure with commercial van insurance or you’ve just got your one and only work vehicle that needs van insurance so you can motor about in safety – whatever you do and wherever you go, your insurance rates are likely to be through the roof. Why, you ask? Well it’s because the rest of the drivers on British motorways are absolute pillocks. Not only that but they’re genuinely surprised when their own rates go up, if you can believe that!

No, it’s not just me whinging about poor drivers on the roads – in fact there’s been more than one report that came out over the last week or so reinforcing the fact that all too many motorists are complete rubbish. One research study found a mind-boggling 10 per cent of British drivers don’t even get insurance at all before getting behind the wheel – an that this figure increased over last year by around 6 per cent!

Now I know I’m not the smartest bloke in the room but I’m pretty sure that driving without proper cover is just about the most thick thing you could do, considering that you’re running the risk of getting six points and as much as £300 in fixed penalties if you’re caught. Not only that but your insurance costs will rocket upwards if the authorities find you’re being stupid – and that says nothing to the massive costs the insurance industry has to absorb if you’re in any sort of road traffic accident. Can anyone guess what happens to everyone’s rates in that case? That’s right, they go up – and with some £400 million in costs created by uninsured motorists annually in the UK it’s no wonder driving is an expensive hobby.

Then there are the drivers that might bother to take out proper cover but then don’t pay the slightest attention whilst actually motoring about. Some more recently revealed research found an additional 10 per cent of British drivers are heavily distracted while running errands, doing things like missing turnings and other minor annoyances such as getting into horrific accidents.

Speed cameras and reckless driving: a poor match

Van insurance news roundup: 7 days ending 28 March 2014:

Almost half of British drivers find speed cameras useless, whilst police stops for careless driving have been off the charts over the past six months.

If there’s one singular thing that’s the bane of the white van man, it’s most definitely speed cameras. Well that and insane cyclists, really. However, it’s not just van insurance policyholders that are fed up with speed cameras – almost half of the entire motoring public in the UK is ready to bin the whole speed camera system entirely according to a recent research study.

In fact, some 45 per cent of survey respondents said that the speed camera does absolutely nothing to make the roads safer. Some felt that it could even be making things more dangerous, what with motorists keeping a close eye on their speed instead of the rest of the traffic they share the road with – those damned cyclists included.

Other drivers polled said that they could imagine motorists braking suddenly after spying a speed camera, leading to the most notorious road traffic accidents – rear-end collisions – that have a nasty knock-on effect of raising car insurance rates for everyone. At the same time, there’s even more evidence that speed cameras aren’t making a lick of difference either way according to another independent research study that was published this week.

What has been on the increase, according to the research data, is careless driving. Six months ago, new regulations went into effect that carried much more stringent penalties for being an arse behind the wheel of your vehicle, and since then there’s been in excess of 5,000 police stops for that specific reason.

So yes, everyone hates reckless drivers, especially when they’re lane-hogs or tailgating you for miles. At least now you can get fined or earn a few penalty points on your licence for the activity; you would think that with all the ire that motorist have towards speed cameras they wouldn’t have time to be pillocks whilst driving but apparently some old habits die a bit hard, don’t they?

Get ready for more unfair treatment from insurance companies

Van insurance news roundup: 7 days ending 21 March 2014:

It seems like there’s no end to the way car and van insurance companies will mistreat their customers – but this week’s news stories absolutely take the cake.

This time, it looks like that the insurance market has specifically excluded whole swathes of the car and van driving community all in an effort to provide ‘relief’ to very specific classes of drivers. There are new rules going into effect through an amendment to the Rehabilitation of Offenders Act that’s designed to help Brits that have done time for their offences and are trying to rebuild their lives that would strip the requirement to disclose their criminal records whilst applying for things like insurance and bank lending, but insurance lobbyists have made sure to have the amendment worded to purposefully exclude drivers with penalty points or licence endorsements.

In other words, you might find it easier to secure commercial van insurance if you’ve been to jail for burglary and paid your debt to society than if you were otherwise responsible but have had more than your fair share of parking or speeding tickets. Does this seem fair to anyone at all? Because it certainly doesn’t seem all that fair to me in the least.

This isn’t just some proposed change, either – it’s going into effect very soon and that means it’s going to impact motorists on the road today. In fact, another story comes to ind that I read this week involving a student that took his mother’s car out to pick up some cigarettes only to end up being involved in an accident on his way home and then fleeing the scene.

The 20 year old, who not only had taken his mum’s car without permission, was also driving without any insurance cover. This is of course why he panicked and left the scene of the road traffic accident. Not that it helped much – he was caught, and now he’s got some 80 hours of community service to fulfill as well as a one-year driving ban. By then the new rules will be in effect and he’ll have a devil of a time getting insurance cover for his own vehicle because these incidents will stay on his criminal record for up to five years. Meanwhile if he had walked to the corner shop for the cigarettes and robbed the place he wouldn’t have nearly the same trouble. Again, this isn’t fair in the least.

Is telematics going to take over the insurance world?

Van insurance news roundup: 7 days ending 13 March 2014:

If you’re tired of shelling out an arm and a leg on your commercial van insurance, worry not – it looks like telematics-based insurance is poised to take over.

If you’re unaware of the technology behind telematics-based car insurance, it’s not really all that complex. It’s based on the same tech that powers your satnav, only instead of providing you turn-by-turn directions it instead spies on you whilst you’re behind the wheel. Oh yes, insurers will try to spin it to a more positive light but let’s be completely honest: a telematics device, once fitted, keeps close tabs on your motoring habits. Step out of line – drive too fast, brake too hard, take corners too recklessly – and your insurance rates will go up. Stay within the law and behave yourself and your car insurance costs will decline.

It’s good business, as long as you don’t mind giving up your privacy rights in exchange for cheaper van insurance, but with the typical insurance provider more interested in making as much money as they can off you telematics is bound to become incredibly popular. In fact, a new research study released this week discovered that telematics-based insurers are in a prime position to take the world by storm – and British drivers are ready to switch over in order to save some serious cash.

It isn’t just British drivers either, according to another news story that broke this week. US mobile giant Sprint is announcing that they will be providing connectivity for telematics devices in the US. That’s not all, though – AT&T, one of Sprint’s main rivals in the US telecoms market, is also rapidly approaching the unveiling of a similar service that it will market in direct competition to Sprint.

Now I know I’m a bit critical of telematics insurance, but I do have to admit that it could be an excellent way for commercial van fleets to save cash in the long run, especially since it encourages employees to drive more carefully (and that there’s direct evidence of whether or not they’ve been behaving according to the telematics data).

Insurers respect none of us – not even celebrities

Van insurance news roundup: 7 days ending 7 March 2014:

I’ve been saying for years how car insurance and van insurance companies don’t respect their customers, but now there’s even more evidence proving me right.

In fact, not even celebrities are free from the all-encompassing grasp of vehicle insurers, as a new interview with James Purefoy just revealed this week. Purefoy, star of film and television that’s best known for his riveting performance as Mark Anthony on ‘Rome,’ said his insurer actually rang him up to inform him his rates were being hiked – and all because he was in a relationship with another celebrity at the time.

Some time ago, Purefoy was romantically involved with fellow star Gwyneth Paltrow, and while the relationship has since ended – on good terms – the aftermath of if lingers on in his insurance premiums. Purefoy ruefully recounted a tale how a particularly diligent insurance employee rang him up after seeing a picture of him and Paltrow in his car, and informed him that his rates were going up by £500. I didn’t know that dating a celebrity made you a worse driver, but apparently it does! Either way the insurer made an additional 500 quid out of the deal.

Of course if insurers treat celebrities this way, imagine how they treat the white van man that lives down the street from you. That’s right: insurers see us as little more than vast pinatas they can just keep hitting until we split open and rain money down on them, and insurers are making a mint. To prove my point massive insurance group Admiral just announced its 2013 pre-tax profits have gone up by 7 per cent from the previous year’s to a jaw-dropping £370 million. That’s not revenue – that’s profits.

So where’s that money coming from? Well where do you think? It’s people like us that get raked over the coals, simply because we have no choice if we want to keep our vehicles on the road legally. Personal and commercial van insurance providers have us all over a barrel, and even as insurers pat themselves on the back for ‘reducing insurance costs’ – evidenced by market surveys that are ever skewed in their favour. It’s enough to make you sell your car and just walk everywhere. Good luck doing that if you don’t have public transport links in your region!

Bad week for insurance customers as fraud ramps up yet again

Van insurance news roundup: 7 days ending 28 Feb 2014:

Car insurance and van insurance customers just can’t seem to win this week with the amount of fraud that just came to light once more, driving up costs for all.

New data indicates that more than 1,000 motorists are victimised every week by fraudsters staging crashes. In fact there have been around 300,000 ‘cash for crash’ saged road traffic accidents since 2008, ruining the day of countless drivers and giving insurers – and their customers – massive headaches in the form of hiked premium prices.

Fraudsters know who just to target, too, when it comes to their criminal pursuits. Turns out that women and younger Brits are a specific favourite, which turns into a case of chicken or the egg as these classes of drivers are often accused of being statistically more likely to be involved in an accident. Is it that scammers are targeting these motorists because of these statistics or if they’re causing these statistics in the first place? Can you even believe it?

Then again there’s even more to complain about when it comes to fraud levels this week. Just when you thought that the criminal behaviour is confined to gangs of fraudsters roaming the country’s motorways and crashing into lorries to drive up commercial van insurance premiums, it turns out that there was a positively massive security breach at major insurer Aviva.

Apparently two former Aviva employees – long since sacked, thanks goodness – stand accused of making off with tens of thousands of the personal records of policyholders that have been involved in an accident of some kind. They’ve taken these records and allegedly have sold them on to claims management companies who then have turned around and begun to solicit these accident victims to bring RTA claims

So yes, apparently there’s no honour amongst thieves – or those who profit from thievery. It’s one thing to have organised fraud rings smashing into you at roundabouts but now you’ve got ambulance-chasing claims management companies coming after you and pestering you to allow them to make claims on your behalf! All of this claims activity just drives up premiums even further of course, so don’t be surprised if your annual cover gets a lot more expensive any time soon.

 

Worst drivers in the UK revealed – guess who they aren’t?

Van insurance news roundup: 7 days ending 21 Feb 2014:

This week, new research findings were revealed that will finally set the record straight as to who the worst drivers in the UK are – and where to find them.

Car insurance and van insurance companies simply love to charge you astronomical rates based on rather arbitrary things such as your postcode, with their twisted logic being that if you live in an area with statistically higher accident rates that immediately means you’re going to be a poor driver as well. Whether or not this is true, it’s undeniable that insurers aren’t going to let go of this criterion any time soon – and the DVLA has recently announced that there’s one particular place in the UK that has the highest concentration of terrible motorists.

The West Midlands seems to be the region with the biggest problem, the research data suggests, with the town of Smethwick holding the dubious honour of having the highest number of banned drivers on a percentage basis. Out of the more than 20,000 licence holders living nearby, 0.77 per cent of them have had their privileges stripped from them after repeated offences – and that’s the highest percentage in the entirety of the UK.

There’s even more shocking news this week as well though, where an independent research study discovered that there are certain kinds of Brits that are worse drivers than others. By profession, some of the safest motorists turn out to be people who drive a commercial van for a living – something that hopefully all those commercial van insurance companies will start taking into account!

This bit of information just chuffs me to bits. I enjoy any opportunity I can get to stick my thumb in the eye of anyone who swears up and down that van drivers are poor motorists, so this data quite simply fills me with unbridled glee. Meanwhile the professions most likely to be awful drivers are all in the medical field – in fact, a full 8 out of the 10 worst motorists in the UK by profession were all medical professionals like doctors, dentists, and other health workers.

This is simply vindicating to me, and I can’t wait to rub it in to everyone who trots out that old chestnut of the white van man being a terrible motorist. I wonder if this will lead to any higher rates for family doctors. Probably not, but it would be some nice poetic justice!

No reward for loyalty – what about good driving?

Van insurance news roundup: 7 days ending 14 Feb 2014:

Brits know better than anyone that van and car insurance companies don’t reward loyalty – but there are some out there that recognise good motoring habits.

Car and van insurance companies are notorious for holding on to their cheapest rates for new customers, routinely throwing their older customers under the bus by hiking their premium prices year on year. As a result, Brits have learnt to jump ship every year in order to get the best quotes they can – and a new research study reinforces this fact, as 57 per cent of British drivers are giving serious thought to switching from one insurer to another this coming year. Even more telling is that the worldwide average is only 40 per cent, acknowledging that the UK has some very disloyal motorists – by the hand of the insurance industry itself!

So insurers don’t reward you for you for loyalty – that’s just a well-established fact at this point. However, there are some insurers that will actually reward you for good driving. Anyone that makes a living on the road and is in need of commercial van insurance is likely to be quite keen to check this out: it’s called telematics insurance, and it’s been growing in popularity because you can get around the normal insurance bollocks and get some deep discounts if you can prove you’re worthy of them.

The technology is simple, as it’s based on the tried-and-true satnav: a telematics device (or a smartphone with an appropriate app running) keeps track of your acceleration, turning, braking, and other motoring habits, then transmits the data to your insurer. It looks at your performance periodically and if the information reveals you’re a careful driver, your insurer drops your premiums to compensate. Of course, if you’re a crap driver you’ll see your rates go up, but you’ve earned that as well haven’t you?

But think about this: if you spend hours behind the wheel of y our van, you’re likely to be a very careful driver. Your vehicle is your livelihood after all, so it’s in your best interests to actually keep your wits about you, and you should be rewarded for that diligence! It’s also ideal for younger drivers as well, as you can throw off the yoke of statistical analysis and prove not all younger drivers are complete rubbish. Some younger Brits have saved upwards of £430 on their annual cover, and that’s no laughing matter is it?

Best insurance deals only for few, despite what insurers say

Van insurance news roundup: 7 days ending 7 Feb 2014:

Car insurance companies love saying how cover is cheaper than ever, but let’s be honest: only for a select few customers. The rest of us pay big.

The latest load of bollocks from the car and van insurance industry has surfaced, courtesy of the Association of British Insurers. The ABI says that the average price of a comprehensive insurance policy is now only £370 – an amazing drop of 9 percentage points over last year. While on the face of it this sounds like cause to celebrate – and I’ll admit I felt some initial relief upon reading these new figures – but then I noticed one very important facet: it’s just an ‘average.’

Do you know what that means? There are people who supposedly pay less than this (though heavens knows where these people live) and there are also shedloads of people who pay more. Who pays more than the average amount of £370? Well ask yourself – how much did you pay for your insurance this year? I’ll wager it’s more than that – much more, if you happen to make a living driving a van or if you’re a younger driver. Heaven help you if you’re both!

Younger drivers are absolutely raked over the coals by insurers. In fact insurance companies charge younger Brits so much that they’re often priced right out of keeping a vehicle unless they get some help from their parents; unfortunately there’s a growing trend where well-meaning parents actually end up breaking the law by putting their children on their own policies as a secondary driver even when they’re not.

It’s called fronting, and it’s quite illegal. Apparently insurers don’t like it when you tell them a car is being driven only occasionally by a secondary driver and then in actuality is driven every day by them instead. Being caught fronting can invalidate the insurance for that car, and that could mean a big repair bill that you’ll have to pay out-of-pocket if you get into an accident. It could also complicate things down the line when you try to get insurance cover on your own – insurers take a bit of a dim view of the activity.

I know it’s illegal but what else are younger Brits supposed to do if their premiums are so high as to be completely unaffordable? No, I’m not condoning the behaviour, but I can say that I understand it implicitly.

Insurance rates down, while other costs threaten on horizon

Van insurance news roundup: 7 days ending 31 Jan 2013:

It’s true that some motoring costs like car insurance and van insurance have eased this year, but unfortunately other costs are rising higher and higher.

The good news is that insurance rates have fallen by 14.1 per cent year-on-year according to the AA’s latest research. This is even more noteworthy because the motoring organisation has never seen such a drop ever; the source of the downward spiral has been linked to insurers both responding to a highly competitive environment and trying to stay ahead of the curve prior to new rules that could be going into effect soon that are specifically engineered to reduce the impact of fraudulent whiplash claims.

Now if this keeps up it will be fantastic, but shedloads of insurance experts say that there’s a danger of things dropping down so low that the market can’t support it, with the result of prices rebounding back up towards much more expensive rates. However, even if this doesn’t happen there are some ridiculous other costs that motorists have to worry about, and anyone who makes a living behind the wheel like a white van man has to worry about things like road fines, which have been rocketing upwards over the years.

In fact, new research discovered that motorists had to pay more than 1.3 million road fines during the 2011-2012 financial year, all for minor offences. This was found to be 16 per cent higher than the previous year – and represented a cost of £135 million to all the motorists that had to pay these fines! That’s a lot of money, and it’s most likely less about keeping the roads safe and more about generating revenue for local authorities. I mean let’s be serious here for a moment – do we really need all these traffic cameras set up in strange locations that aren’t necessarily high-accident areas just so the local council can generate some more money for their coffers?

Let’s get real – the nation’s roads are much safer then they’ve ever been, and I highly doubt that it’s the number of traffic cameras or motoring offences that are being handed out by police. Accident rates have been coming down consistently for years, and I’d like to know if there’s any research linking higher road offences to safer roads; somehow I sincerely doubt it though. Why are the roads safer than ever but local authorities are penalising drivers for this? We don’t need this kind of madness on our roads, as it’s hard enough to keep the fuel tank full with rising petrol costs and other things.

Step 1

Complete your quick and easy quote

Step 2

Reveal your van insurance policies

Step 3

Pick your favourite and get instant cover